Urban Air Mobility (UAM) and Regional Air Mobility (RAM), both falling under the broader umbrella of Advanced Air Mobility (AAM), are rapidly moving beyond aircraft development and demonstration flights into a far more complex phase of infrastructure deployment and commercial integration. While we recognize that distinctions between aircraft types, such as eVTOLs, eSTOLs, and eCTOLs, are important within the market, for consistency throughout the agenda we will collectively refer to these manufacturers as "air taxi OEMs." Integrating infrastructure, airspace, energy systems, operations, regulation, and city networks into commercially deployable transportation ecosystems. While aircraft capability continues to advance, scaling UAM/RAM now depends on solving system-level integration challenges that extend far beyond the aircraft itself.

This opening keynote introduces the operational, infrastructure, regulatory, and ecosystem constraints currently shaping the next phase of Urban Air Mobility and Regional Air Mobility deployment and how OEMs, operators, infrastructure providers, regulators, airports, and cities are approaching the transition from isolated programmes to scalable, integrated networks.

Learning Objectives:

As Spain accelerates its deployment of U-Space to safely integrate a highly active drone ecosystem and prepare for future air taxi operations, the frontline challenge has shifted from conceptual design to strict regulatory execution. Leading the charge, the national air navigation service provider is actively navigating the complex, first-of-its-kind certification process to become a designated Common Information Service Provider (CISP) by the end of 2026, alongside upcoming submissions to the National Supervisory Authority (NSA) to certify as a U-Space Service Provider (USSP).

Drawing directly from the practical complexities of this pioneering certification journey, this session addresses the core friction points between Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs), the Civil Aviation Authority (AESA), and National Supervisory Authorities (NSA). With current acceptable means of compliance (AMC) and guidance materials heavily adapted from traditional manned aviation or legacy helicopter guidelines, both service providers and regulators face immense challenges in interpreting how these frameworks apply to highly automated, low-altitude digital ecosystems.

Attendees will gain a comprehensive understanding of the tactical roadmap required to achieve CISP and USSP status, the methodologies needed to bridge compliance gaps with national regulators, and the collaborative frameworks necessary to unlock routine, scalable advanced air mobility across Spain's key regional hubs.

Learning Objectives:

Spain is progressing within a complex European and multi-level regulatory environment. The panel will explore how existing frameworks can evolve towards proportionate, performance-based and operationally informed approval processes.

This panel brings together leaders from Spain’s prominent aerospace cluster and national regulatory pipelines to analyze real-world implementation bottlenecks without being overtly critical. By evaluating Brazil's high-velocity deployment methods alongside domestic parameters, the panel serves as a constructive, collaborative forum to engage Spanish authorities. Speakers will map out how Spain can safely modernize its approval pipelines, repurpose existing infrastructure without triggering land-scarcity penalties, and resolve urban integration challenges unique to historic municipal areas.

Learning Objectives:

EA Maven has supported OEMs, airports, governments, investors, infrastructure developers, and transportation operators around the world in evaluating future UAM networks, conducting route assessments, demand modelling, infrastructure studies, fleet planning exercises, energy forecasts, and deployment strategies designed to determine where and how Urban Air Mobility can realistically scale.

Drawing on projects ranging from large-scale network planning studies involving more than 20 vertiports and 150 aircraft, to route and infrastructure assessments for leading eVTOL manufacturers and government-backed Future Flight programmes, this session explores the practical realities of transforming UAM concepts into commercially viable transportation networks.

Attendees will gain insight into the methodologies used to determine where Urban Air Mobility should launch first, how networks should be designed, what infrastructure is required, how much energy future operations will consume, how many aircraft are needed, and what a realistic deployment roadmap actually looks like.

Learning Objectives:

Airport-to-city transfers represent the most profitable early use case for eVTOL services, yet mixing low-altitude aircraft with traditional commercial air traffic presents major operational headaches. This session tackles the physical and structural difficulties of co-locating vertiports inside major airport environments.

Learning Objectives:

While early Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) network mapping in the United States and the Middle East heavily relies on airport-to-airport corridors, Europe's urban transportation landscape dictates a much denser, integrated approach. Deploying eVTOL, eSTOL, and eCTOL networks in Europe requires placing vertiports directly into the center of mass-such as multimodal train stations, commercial districts, and historic municipal hubs.

However, bringing aviation into the heart of European cities introduces severe regulatory and safety bottlenecks. This session cuts through the commercial hype to address the strict regulatory realities mandated by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). We will explore how infrastructure developers, OEMs, and city planners must align their physical network topology with EASA’s uncompromising safety standards, certification pathways, and vertiport design specifications before a single commercial flight can be authorized over populated areas.

Learning Objectives:

As Urban Air Mobility networks move toward higher-frequency operations, energy infrastructure is rapidly emerging as one of the defining constraints on scalable deployment. Delivering megawatt-scale charging capability within dense urban environments introduces significant challenges across grid capacity, energy resilience, charging architecture, infrastructure investment, and operational planning.

Attention is increasingly shifting toward how operators, utilities, infrastructure developers, and cities can support high-power UAM operations without creating unsustainable pressure on existing urban energy networks.

Learning Objectives:

The challenge is rapidly shifting from conceptual vertiport design to delivering infrastructure that can be approved, integrated, financed, and operated efficiently within complex urban environments. Safety requirements, passenger throughput, energy demand, regulatory approval, and integration with existing transport systems are all becoming critical factors shaping deployment feasibility.

Cities, infrastructure developers, operators, and regulators are working to determine how vertiports can support high-frequency operations while fitting within the operational, spatial, and regulatory realities of dense urban environments.

Learning Objectives:

Advanced Air Mobility cannot operate in a vacuum; it must function as a seamless extension of existing municipal public transport. This session explores the physical and operational challenges of building direct connections between rooftop vertiports and subterranean train, metro, or bus terminals.

Learning Objectives:

Community acceptance is one of the defining constraints on scalable UAM deployment. Beyond aircraft performance alone, operational frequency, route structure, vertiport location, flight corridors, and cumulative acoustic impact are shaping how — and where networks can realistically scale within urban environments.

As cities, operators, OEMs, and regulators move toward commercial deployment, attention is shifting toward how acoustic engineering, operational planning, and urban integration strategies can support quieter, more socially acceptable operations at scale.

Learning Objectives:

As Urban Air Mobility networks scale toward higher-frequency operations, ground operations are becoming a critical determinant of utilisation, operational efficiency, and commercial viability. Passenger handling, boarding procedures, turnaround coordination, security processing, and vertiport logistics will all directly influence throughput, aircraft availability, and network performance across increasingly complex urban operating environments.

The focus is now shifting toward how operators, vertiport developers, airports, and mobility providers can streamline end-to-end passenger flow while maintaining safety, efficiency, and operational reliability at scale.

Learning Objectives:

The decision between fast charging, battery swapping, hybrid approaches, and energy buffering systems directly influences aircraft utilisation, turnaround time, vertiport design, operational flexibility, infrastructure investment, and long-term network economics.

Operators, OEMs, infrastructure providers, and energy developers are now evaluating how different replenishment strategies can support scalable, high-throughput UAM operations across increasingly constrained urban environments.

Learning Objectives:

Most drone logistics discussions focus on the aircraft: payload, range, autonomy and certification. However, scalable logistics will depend just as much on the infrastructure around the aircraft. For cargo drones to move from pilot projects to recurring operations, the industry must solve the ground layer: droneports, vertiports, cargo handover, charging or battery swapping, site selection, U-space integration, safety procedures, logistics IT interfaces, and integration into existing industrial, healthcare and supply-chain flows. The panel will therefore focus less on “what drones can do” and more on what infrastructure must be designed, tested and deployed so that drones can become a reliable logistics layer.

Learning Objectives:

The industry's immediate roadblock is not managing hundreds of simultaneous autonomous aircraft, but rather proving we can scale initial flight operations safely within legacy airspace. Early eVTOL flights will operate under traditional Visual Flight Rules (VFR). This session bypasses futuristic high-density theories to confront the immediate friction point: how air traffic management, ANSPs, and early operators can incrementally scale operations-moving from one flight a day to one flight an hour-without disrupting or introducing unsustainable operational complexity into existing commercial aviation corridors.

Learning Objectives:

While early flights rely on human pilots and traditional rules, the medium-to-long-term viability of Advanced Air Mobility hinges on U-Space integration. However, shifting from piloted execution to automated U-Space architectures introduces immense technical hurdles. This session addresses the profound operational realities of allowing autonomous systems to make real-time decisions regarding vehicle separation, dynamic routing, and landing priority. Experts will unpack the technical constraints of true U-Space deployment for both eVTOL passenger aircraft and regional cargo networks.

Learning Objectives:

As the first eVTOL manufacturer to pursue large-scale autonomous passenger operations, EHang has been required to solve many of the operational challenges that much of the industry has yet to encounter.

This session explores the operational architecture underpinning autonomous air mobility, examining how command-and-control centres, fleet supervision systems, remote operational management, vertiport infrastructure, passenger handling processes, and network-wide fleet coordination come together to support safe and scalable operations.

Learning Objectives:

Drawing on ongoing flight demonstration programs, real-world regional route testing-such as the upcoming 2027 Norwegian Test Arena flights-and advanced market research into thousands of underserved global corridors, this session tackles the critical friction points of building functional air networks beyond major metropolitan hubs. While global manufacturing certification gains momentum, the true frontline challenge lies on the ground: securing viable landing sites and achieving operational alignment across municipal and state jurisdictions.

Attendees will gain insight into the collaborative models needed between OEMs, infrastructure developers, and municipal planners to unlock regional access, the spatial requirements of multi-use urban vertiports, and how right-sized hybrid aircraft can transform regional airports into premium feeder nodes for major transportation networks.

Learning Objectives:

For Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) to evolve from experimental technology into a profitable transportation market, the industry must pivot its core dialogue away from simple aircraft certification toward brutal commercial realities. Major commercial airlines have clearly indicated they will not directly fund or build real-estate-heavy vertiport networks; instead, their strategy relies on asset-light, multi-operator partnerships where smaller regional operators handle the flying pipelines, feeding passenger traffic directly into primary airline routes. However, a major commercial standoff remains: who bears the capital expenditure of establishing city-center infrastructure, and how will those costs be shared dynamically across multiple operators, airports, and private real estate firms?

Using empirical demand modeling-which dictates that a network requires massive scale and high-frequency, multi-route deployment to achieve profitability over a single aircraft silo-this panel deconstructs the unit economics of European infrastructure deployment. Bringing together an elite group of airline network strategists, multi-regional operators, and infrastructure developers, this session bridges the gap between public transit and commercial viability, outlining realistic financing models for Southern European urban and regional corridors.

Learning Objectives:

The success of UAM will depend on the industry's ability to build the operational frameworks, workforce capabilities, safety systems, and organisational infrastructure required to deliver reliable transportation services every day, at scale.

Delivering safe, reliable, and scalable eVTOL services requires the creation of an entirely new operational ecosystem comprising pilots, operators, dispatchers, maintenance organisations, operational control centres, safety management systems, training frameworks, certification pathways, and workforce development strategies.

This panel brings together operators, OEMs, regulators, training providers, airports, infrastructure developers, and operational specialists to examine the practical realities of creating a commercially viable Urban Air Mobility operating environment. Drawing on lessons from commercial aviation, helicopter operations, advanced air mobility programmes, and early deployment initiatives, the discussion will explore the capabilities, systems, and organisational structures required to support routine operations at scale.

Learning Objectives:

High-frequency UAM networks may become commercially unviable if maintenance downtime, inspection cycles, battery servicing, and fleet availability are not radically more efficient than traditional aviation models. Because unlike conventional aviation: turnaround windows are shorter, utilisation targets are higher, route frequency is denser, urban operations are less tolerant of disruption,and maintenance models may need to evolve entirely.

That’s what OEMs, operators, MRO providers, and airports care about.

Fleet availability and maintenance efficiency will be critical to achieving operational reliability and commercial performance.

Key Discussion Points:

High-frequency UAM networks will generate enormous volumes of real-time operational data across aircraft, vertiports, passengers, charging infrastructure, maintenance systems, airspace coordination, and fleet dispatch. Without tightly integrated digital operations platforms, the complexity of managing interconnected urban mobility networks could rapidly become operationally unsustainable.

Delivering scalable operations will require far greater levels of real-time coordination, predictive operational visibility, automated decision support, and system-wide interoperability than existing aviation and mobility systems were originally designed to support.

Learning Objectives:

Scalable UAM operations may become vulnerable to disruption because they depend on deeply interconnected, real-time digital systems that traditional aviation infrastructure was never designed around. That’s the challenge.

The fear is not just cyber attacks,It’s: GPS spoofing, signal degradation, operational disruption, loss of situational awareness, infrastructure failure, cascading system outages, operational paralysis across interconnected networks.

That’s what resonates with airports, ANSPs, operators, OEMs, regulators,infrastructure developers, and UTM providers.

As UAM ecosystems become increasingly connected and digitally managed, cybersecurity and operational resilience are emerging as critical deployment priorities across Europe.

Learning Objectives:

UAM deployment timelines, operational scalability, certification readiness, and fleet availability may all become constrained by immature, fragmented, or aviation-unproven supply chains. That’s the pressure point.

The real concerns are: supplier maturity, certification capability, production scalability, battery availability, semiconductor constraints, infrastructure component availability, operational continuity, and dependency on unproven vendors.

Scaling commercially viable UAM networks will depend heavily on whether OEMs, operators, infrastructure developers, and suppliers can build aviation-grade supply ecosystems capable of supporting high-frequency operations at scale.

Learning Objectives:

Urban Air Mobility deployment will increasingly depend on whether cities, regulators, operators, airports, infrastructure developers, and mobility providers can align around shared operational, regulatory, infrastructure, and public acceptance frameworks.

While aircraft capability and infrastructure investment continue to advance rapidly, fragmented governance, inconsistent regulation, competing stakeholder priorities, unclear deployment ownership, infrastructure coordination gaps, and differing timelines between public and private sector organisations are emerging as major barriers to scalable deployment across Europe’s evolving UAM ecosystem.

Cities, Regulators & Operators: Defining the Future UAM/RAM Ecosystem

Not all cities, regions, and countries are equally positioned to support scalable Urban Air Mobility operations. Infrastructure readiness, airport integration, energy capacity, airspace flexibility, regulatory maturity, public acceptance, and political alignment are all emerging as critical factors influencing where commercially viable UAM networks can realistically scale first.

As operators, OEMs, airports, infrastructure developers, and investors evaluate deployment strategy, increasing attention is being placed on identifying which markets are structurally capable of supporting sustainable high-frequency UAM operations over the long term.

Learning Objectives:

This session explicitly maps the "Decision-Maker Hierarchy" that currently dictates whether a vertiport or air-taxi route receives a permit. We move beyond generic networking to define which stakeholders-from urban planners to national safety regulators-must agree on specific operational parameters (noise, footprint, public safety) to move from "pilot project" to "city-wide integration."

The Decision-Maker Hierarchy: A pragmatic mapping of authority:

The AAM industry is currently saturated with non-binding MOUs that rarely translate into operational flight networks. This session abandons the legal "failure" narrative to focus on the real-world market, operational, and stakeholder friction points that prevent partners from making the final commitment to operate. We examine why infrastructure, fleet, and local transit partners are hesitant to "pull the trigger" and what operational clarity is required to bridge the gap between a memorandum and a binding commercial launch.

Learning Objectives:

Bringing together top leaders from across the aircraft, infrastructure, and investment sectors, this final wrap-up panel charts a realistic path forward for the industry over the next five years. The discussion moves past promotional talk to define the precise financial, legal, and operational milestones required to transition Southern Europe from early flight tests into a profitable mass transportation market.

Learning Objectives: